|
Cost effectiveness (CE) of blinatumomab (BLIN) versus inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) in adult patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with no more than one prior salvage therapy (S0/S1) from a United Kingdom health care perspective. |
|
|
Consulting or Advisory Role - Novartis (Inst) |
Research Funding - 21st Century Oncology (Inst); Abbvie (Inst); Amgen (Inst); ARIAD (Inst); EMD Serono (Inst); GlaxoSmithKline (Inst); Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Inst); Lilly (Inst); Merck (Inst); Merck (Inst); Novartis (Inst); Pfizer (Inst); Sanofi (Inst); Seagen (Inst); Takeda (Inst); Vertex (Inst) |
|
|
|
Stock and Other Ownership Interests - Amgen |
|
|
Consulting or Advisory Role - Amgen (Inst) |
Research Funding - Amgen (Inst) |
Travel, Accommodations, Expenses - Novartis |
|
|
Consulting or Advisory Role - Amgen; Amgen (Inst); Pfizer; Pfizer (Inst); Regeneron; Regeneron (Inst); Sanofi; Sanofi (Inst) |
Research Funding - Amgen; Amgen (Inst); Pfizer; Pfizer (Inst); Regeneron; Regeneron (Inst); Sanofi; Sanofi (Inst) |
|
|
|
Stock and Other Ownership Interests - Amgen |
|
|
|
Stock and Other Ownership Interests - Amgen |
|
|
No Relationships to Disclose |